Archive for » 2006 «

Friday, November 24th, 2006 | Author: Moody

Smoke a cigarette as the evening’s last sunlight dies behind the silencing veil of weightless white clouds turned dark orange, goldenrod, light coral and indian red, slate blue and orchid…. Smoke a cigarette as the air chills and the street lights come on. Cars light up along the freeway in glowing red and shining white; cars, — dark shapes between alien words of light, indecipherable and blurred. Cars as a metaphor for my thought. Far above, there appear the first of the few stars visible here, far above, far removed, distant — but like relatives still close as blood. Smoke a cigarette; inhale the killing carcinogens, exhale the dying dreams.

And the drift net of my concern, my grasping care for my life, catches on the heights of the city’s boxlike structures and all its poles and towering forms, like the words catch in my throat even now.

It is the season again for me to wonder why: “Why on earth do I go on?” And although I have answers — varied and sundry — it all feels somehow sadly like a collection of dryly pragmatic excuses to my own heart. Crush out the cigarette. Watch the last feeble stream of smoke drift into nothingness, or a haze of pointlessness (as it were; and what’s the difference?). I am here, now, and it is another day. And it is the season for me to wonder why. I wonder why.

Disparate images: all the jetsam of longing and flotsam of hope gathering itself together on an endless strand of an otherwise empty beach… while Sigur Rós’s ( ) — “Untitled 4″, currently — plays in my headphones. What am I telling myself? What is it I hear?

My mind keeps going back to the interview with Robert Pirsig I recently read. He’s 78 years old, now, almost twice my age, and yet I feel closer to his age than to half of my own. Bookstores still place Zen & The Art of Motorcycle Maintenance and Lila in the “New Age” section rather than the philosophy section. That book — along with Henry Miller’s Tropic of Cancer and Thomas Pynchon’s Gravity’s Rainbow — changed my life, or the way I think about my life. But at the age of 40 years, I have to wonder what the change mattered, what it meant if I make it current and ask what it means now. I am not a contented person. I am not a “happy” person. I am not satisfied. Nor do I believe I ever will be any of those things. What I found in ZMM was not an answer but a deep, abiding, permanent question that Lila did not seek to answer but only compounded. I gather from the interview with Pirsig that he is still working on it for himself, but I am perhaps projecting a bit (for the fact is that I don’t really know). And I have to admit that Pirsig’s path is not mine after all, however similar it may appear to be, …which is for the best, of course, because I can learn more from the quality of our differences, you know?

I tried reading the 30,000 page menu at the metaphysics restaurant and found nothing in the end (which, as Pirsig points out, is what they serve there). But unlike Pirsig, I did not find myself asking the question, “Why, for example, should a group of simple, stable compounds of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen and nitrogen struggle for billions of years to organize themselves into a professor of chemistry? What’s the motive?” The answer is simply that there was no motive, and it’s too bad for those people who feel unhappy about that. All we have are our own motives as we find them, and they exist beyond physics (qua the physical universe) even as they emerge from and depend, in the end, on them (so far as we can know or rationally assert); i.e., there is no way to know or experience them apart from what we, as human beings, who are a (by-?) product of the physical universe, know and experience as the universe. So-called “metaphysical” ideas are, themselves, merely part of the physical world like any other thoughts. Putting it in entirely other language: with regard to so-called “metaphysics”, there is nothing to transcend and nothing to transcend in-to. To quote Pirsig again, “The only Zen you find on the tops of mountains is the Zen you bring up there”. That really rather says it all.

So, here I am. Darkness has settled over this side of the planet and the sun, existing as it does in the sky of some other country, is for me but a remembered thing I expect to see again. An old French comedy, Marquet and Tati’s Mr. Hulot’s Holiday (Les Vacances Monsieur Hulot, 1953), plays on the television. My lover is sleeping. The heat of the room is impersonally palpating my skin and my ears feel damp, nestled in my headphones, as “Untitled 9 A” plays sweetly, sadly, beautifully…. I am not sure what I am doing. I light another cigarette. It’s the weekend, and I have time left in my life to figure things out, for whatever that’s worth. But I am also fairly sure that I shall feel again like I know what’s it all about, when I am in the middle of an extended embrace and loving eyes are fixed on mine, all acceptance and empathy, and love slays that noisome portion of my mind once more… (though, that is not why I go on).

Category: Personal  | Comments off
Saturday, November 18th, 2006 | Author: Moody

It gets me every time: some fool spouting off — in a more or less straighforward manner — about how sexuality and its myriad expressions must be controlled. As PZ Myers reports, Bush “is appointing a certifiable kook to run the federal program that oversees family planning and reproductive health”. This particular cert-k is one Dr. Eric Keroack, an anti-choice, anti-sex bug who has now been appointed by Bush “to oversee Title X funding—the only federal program devoted entirely to family planning and reproductive health”.

The apparent bee in the bonnet of this mad-as-a-hatter doctor is oxytocin, a chemical that is

released during positive social interaction, massage, hugs, “trust” encounters, and sexual intercourse. “It promotes bonding by reducing fear and anxiety in social settings, increasing trust and trustworthiness, reducing stress and pain, and decreasing social aggression,” he said.

The erstwhile doctor claims, in a nutshell, that pretty much only monogamous, married couples are safe from depleting oxytocin levels to the point where they “diminish the power of oxytocin to maintain a permanent bond with an individual”. Never mind that his science is flawed — insofar as it is laughably nonexistent — what is clear is that this idiot has an agenda that is plainly at odds with the position for which he has been appointed. Prof. Myers has already more than adequately laid into the unsoundness of Keroack’s vapid arguments, effectively razing them. What I want to say here has to do with the ethical issues.

Again and again, thanks to the BushCo Pro-Faith Initiative®, we have seen these unsavory religious types of people slipped into positions of governmental authority. Like breeds like. Whether it’s ID/creationism or anti-choice/anti-sex proponents we’re talking about, what remains constant is the religious — specifically, or especially, the evangelical and fundamentalist varieties — bent. Bush keeps trying to ensure that his legacy is a (rather narrowly defined) religious one. Does that not seem problematic in light of the ostensibly non-religious nature of the U.S. government? And isn’t it even more problematic, where the sex lives of human beings are concerned, when such a pinheaded “pro-abstinence” evangelizer who sides with the religious right, is placed in charge of family planning and reproductive health — when it has been shown that “abstinence-only” and similarly unrealistic programs don’t even work?

And Keroack is the medical director of an anti-choice “crisis pregnancy center”, A Woman’s Concern, for crying out loud.

It’s easy to understand: appointing Eric Keroack into any position of authority is a mistake, but appointing him to oversee Title X funding is downright unethical, tantamount to appointing a zealous and hinky furrier as “caretaker for America’s furry animals”. He is simply not fit for the position, in the same way that Bush is not fit to be the POTUS. But of course it’s obvious that Keroack is exactly right for the job so far as Bush is concerned. The doctor oozes that brand of underhanded moralism injected so well by Bush and his religious backers into the mainstream of American politics. He pretends to be an actual scientist when in reality he’s a prude in disguise, a mostly-undercover prig with some power and authority. (Cripes! — but Bush has promoted a lot of them!) And it’s all, in the end, in the name and to the glory of some crushingly dense form of repressive morality, the “necessity” of which is endlessly touted to high heaven (as it were) by a bunch of sexually repressed (undeveloped? malformed? immature?), power-hungry, god-deluded herd animals with a perverse “Father”/penis fixation and ugly self-esteem issues… to mention but a few of their common, uncouth traits.

Understand that it is not healthy, responsible sexual activity that Keroack and his ilk are promoting. Sex for sex’s sake is unwholesome in their book, a hedonistic and sinful flight from what they perceive as the “real purpose” of sex. What they are promoting is the idea that sex ought only to exist for “married couples” who share in “God’s plan”, which, so far as I can tell, involves procreating for the sole purpose of increasing the numbers of people just like them: anti-science, anti-evolution, anti-choice, pro-war, pro-death-penalty, pro-grammed, and “Christian”. And although I don’t doubt that some among them would disagree with my list to some degree or on some point, I assert that they are nonetheless subservient to the heirarchy of those powers who promote them all.

So, you see, the real bee in the bonnet of this mad-as-a-hatter doctor is not oxytocin, it’s the freedom to have sex with whomever you’d like to have sex with (assuming a mature, consensual experience) that vexes him and irritates his moral compass. So just who the hell is he to have authority over such an issue? He’s certainly not the person any sane, rational person would appoint to oversee Title X funding:

The Title X program is the only Federal program devoted solely to the provision of family planning and reproductive health care. The program is designed to provide access to contraceptive supplies and information to all who want and need them with priority given to low-income persons. A broad range of effective and acceptable family planning methods and related preventive health services are available on a voluntary and confidential basis. In addition to contraceptive services and related counseling, Title X supported clinics also provide a number of preventive health services such as: patient education and counseling; breast and pelvic examinations; cervical cancer, STD and HIV screenings; and pregnancy diagnosis and counseling. For many clients, Title X clinics provide the only continuing source of health care and health education.

Do you see? The man will, without a doubt, do his damnedest to subvert and undercut efforts to educate and inform, without a religio-moral bias, those who seek out the answers to their questions about sex-related matters from Title X clinics, and by doing so he will cause unconscionable harm to countless individuals who depend on the assistance of educated professionals — people working for the seekers’ benefit without some agenda that transcends any seeker’s needs as an individual human being.

I urge you to write to your elected representatives and tell them that Dr. Eric Keroack is not merely a bad choice, he is a completely and irrefutably unethical choice for overseeing Title X funding. Also:

The public can file a complaint against him with the American Board of Obsetrics/Gynecology, where he is certified, and the Massachusetts Board of Medicine, where he is licensed. You can reach each at: http://www.abog.org/about/contact.html http://www.massmedboard.org/consumer/complaint.shtm

Thanks to Talk To Action for the two above quoted links.

Thursday, November 16th, 2006 | Author: Moody

You walk into the watershed moment all rainbow by moonlight and plastique by dawn, coronal diadem verses leaping plosively from each uncut jewel and its refractive properties. An alliterative splurge surging westward through the brow, proudly saying, “Fear’s feckless feint frames the fantastic failure of fatalistic misfortune! I am free now forever!” And so you, my Captain, are to the heaving and sparkling prow what the wind-pregnant sail is to the foaming waves or as the cyclopean lighthouse is to the Hydrobatidae of the Straight of Messina. And in the spiralling curls of your amber scented ebony locks — decorated with a thousand drops of life-giving water, resplendant in those locks’ embrace — is the history of the ocean and its love for the moon, your ur-cu sister in blood. And in your eyes is the light of the black sun, shone as from a movie projector. And in your mouth is a scorpion bearing her young through a ring of scarlet fire sweet as pomegranate seeds. And your heart is the furnace of love. So it is you have sailed on through three decades, a myth made of mercury and ash in an earthenware skin glazed by the sugar sweat of stars….

This morning as you lay sleeping, I gazed upon you with the accumulated interest of our times together and I sighed. How it is you came to be here, now, is a tale-and-a-half not to be told out of school. What I know of you is both a blessing and a burden, and, inititiated as I am in your mysteries, all the more reason for me to love you as you are, for who you are and how you are. It is my contention that we have only just embarked on the real voyage of our lives. What came before served to teach us who we are, or were, or could be, — though never the three at one time, or so it seems to me.

Perhaps today marks for you the end of a thirty years’ war; perhaps the treaty you shall sign with your life will mark a new era with whole new freedoms.

Perhaps it’s like I said only yesterday: “Life is like a bargain show in Las Vegas. It’s all in the sequins of events”.

No matter.

Today is your birthday and I am grateful, grateful, grateful for your being here. I’ve all the hope in the world that it will be a good day in the same way that our evening at Mimi’s Café was a good time. You deserve no less — ever. And, too, it is my sincerest wish that every birthday to come will in some wise be better than the previous one.

So, happy birthday, Kisha, my love, my heart, my life. Happy birthday.

Category: Personal  | Comments off
Thursday, November 16th, 2006 | Author: Moody

Joanna Newsom: Ys

[image]Okay, let me put it simply: buy this album, because it is, perhaps, the one album you need to buy this year. I know, I know… I know what some of you are thinking, and I understand. Her previous album, The Milk-Eyed Mender, though often glowingly reviewed, was made for eclectic tastes; pop accessibility was not its selling point, its genuinely quirky and innocent beauty was. Joanna Newsom is, after all, a beautifully eccentric denizen of Faerie, and her brand of folk music is never less than enchanting. When Kisha and I saw her at the Troubadour as an opening act — we went to see her and not the headliner — we were blown away by her sheer talent, but we both understood that many people would not be able to get past her singing style no matter how much they appreciated her words and harp. A shame, that last bit.

But the songs on Ys are not only more accessible. Joanna Newsom has expanded her vocal range and her music exponentially, managing to create on this new work a level of intimacy epic in its range. She has added strings, horns, backing vocals, and other instrumentation, using them judiciously and precisely, in much the same way as Fiona Apple did on the pre-release version of Extraordinary Machine. Vocally, there are complimentary comparisons to Björk’s voice on Vespertine, though they are positively distinct. Lyrically, her poetry has matured and developed in step with her voice’s ability to express it. Her themes are magically intricate tapestries, filled with heady and fresh breezes, touching realms enigmatic and crystal clear by turns, sweet and poignant, filled with sad systole and joyful diastole in the tradition of high literature. She manages to make you feel as if you are sharing in a secret moment, but that moment is the world itself.

Named after the mythical city built by a king for his daughter and drowned beneath the sea, Ys comprises five long tracks — four of which are over 9 minutes long (the fifth track is over 7 minutes) — that pass, alas, too quickly. They are each epic in scope, yet they seem to fly by as quickly as a joyful, meaningful holiday filled with merry meetings, a long dinner with wine and dessert, and great conversations that slowly fade as such conversations do. In other words, at just over fifty-five minutes long, Ys is a treasure for the heart.

With arrangements by Van Dyke Parks, engineering by Steve Albini, and production by Jim O’Rourke, you might think that the album would be more a product of their concerted efforts than her’s. But a first listen will dispell that idea. Their talents have served rather than subsumed Joanna’s work, allowing Ys to remain wholly her own. Which leads to this bold statement: Joanna Newsom’s Ys is worthy of more than a Grammy; it is worthy of becoming one of those works that remains on “Top” lists for decades to come, worthy of being referenced as a watershed moment in music history, worthy of taking its place among the stars whose work has periodically redefined for the better the artistic heights music might attain to.

Buy Joanna Newsom’s Ys and cherish it forever.

Category: Music  | Comments off
Saturday, November 04th, 2006 | Author: Moody
It has long been apparent that every large, land-based animal on this planet is ultimately fighting a losing battle with humankind. And yet entirely befitting of an animal with such a highly developed sensibility, a deep-rooted sense of family and, yes, such a good long-term memory, the elephant is not going out quietly. It is not leaving without making some kind of statement, one to which scientists from a variety of disciplines, including human psychology, are now beginning to pay close attention.

It is a devastating read, Charles Siebert’s “An Elephant Crackup?“, but it is an important and needed read. And not only because of what it says about the plight of the world’s elephant population today. The stunning, inherent revelation is impossible to miss: there is a distinct parallel with the plight of African-Americans, especially African-Americans in their early thirties and younger, of Africans in war-torn countries such as Sudan, Uganda, and Rwanda, and of other peoples the world over.

What we have done and are continuing to do to the elephants is leading to irreversible systemic damage to their culture. It is a perfect reflection of what we are doing to each other, to ourselves. But what the elephants are teaching us, in particular, is that animal species other than our own have psychological lives that parallel and are quite similar to ours. To some people this will not be a surprise. Certainly, many people are aware that it is no case of anthropomorphism when they recognize in their cat, dog, or bird companions some distinct, recognizable emotion that requires no translation. It is easy enough to extend such an understanding to “undomesticated” animals, and the evidence is readily available to support it. But for the majority of us it seems that this is still remarkable news.

We have built up a number of psychological walls between what is demonstrable fact — that many non-human animal species have psychologically rich and complex lives — and that which perpetuates our singular insularity in a sea of so many other species, where we can imagine that we alone are capable of complex thought and self-reflection. We want those barriers against such recognition to remain unbreached because without them we’d have a much harder time exploiting and, more often than not, murdering countless numbers of those “others”. Although it should be fairly clear that we’re capable of coming up with new excuses when our old excuses fail us, and that even without real excuses we are still capable — indeed, willing — to exploit and to murder. This topic has been treated at greater length, and more eloquently, by others (see: Carol Adams, Umberto Eco, Albert Camus, etc.), so I’ll leave it here.

[The elephants] have no future without us. The question we are now forced to grapple with is whether we would mind a future without them, among the more mindful creatures on this earth and, in many ways, the most devoted. Indeed, the manner of the elephants’ continued keeping, their restoration and conservation, both in civil confines and what’s left of wild ones, is now drawing the attention of everyone from naturalists to neuroscientists. Too much about elephants, in the end — their desires and devotions, their vulnerability and tremendous resilience — reminds us of ourselves to dismiss out of hand this revolt they’re currently staging against their own dismissal. And while our concern may ultimately be rooted in that most human of impulses — the preservation of our own self-image — the great paradox about this particular moment in our history with elephants is that saving them will require finally getting past ourselves; it will demand the ultimate act of deep, interspecies empathy.

We are in a time and age that knows more pain and suffering — viewed on a global scale — than virtually any other known to historical records. The deaths from the conflicts in Rwanda, Darfur and Iraq and many other places flow into the deaths caused by starvation, malnutrition, AIDS and other diseases. So many lives displaced, so many lives bound by poverty to perpetual ruin; more names than could be written in a lifetime. In this time of suffering the elephants are showing us something important. Our two tribes are in crisis, though their crisis is perpetuated by ours. How we respond to the crisis of the elephants, and what we think about the response, will reflect, in the end, how we respond to our own. How we respond, and what we think, will illustrate our capacity for understanding the lives of “others”, and it will cause us to consciously bear the responsibility — one that has never been passed off, even in our supposed unconsciousness, without consequence — of our actions. In the end, how we treat “others”, whether human or non-human, is how we treat ourselves, for they are us and we are them in a world that is but one.

. . . . . . . .

It was fortuitous that, the day before reading the NY Times article, Kisha had me listen to an interview with rapper Killer Mike on the October 6th podcast of The Sound of Young America. In it, he discusses the crack cocaine epidemic that devastated countless black families, what life is about for gang members, and the cost of an endemically broken social order, all in terms of his personal history and experience. I recommend that you take the time to listen to it as well. (It is available via iTunes subscription or as an MP3 at the SYA site.)

Category: Society and Culture, The Animal Kingdom  | Comments off
Sunday, October 08th, 2006 | Author: Moody

Just a note to say “Thank You!” to things magazine for linking to me.

I’m honored. ^_^

Category: Personal  | Comments off
Sunday, October 08th, 2006 | Author: Moody

The Decemberists: The Crane Wife

[image]I am beginning to suspect that Colin Meloy and the rest of The Decemberists are incapable of doing anything wrong, are even capable of making things you might think would be wrong all right. Now on a major label, the band have demonstrated with The Crane Wife that they are still themselves even as they try out some pretty radical new ideas. Case in point, the 12′42″ track, “The Island”, which — believe it or not — is a prog rock epic à la Yes, Marillion, and older King Crimson. The song is in three parts: i. “Come and See”, ii. “The Landlord’s Daughter”, iii. “You’ll Not Feel the Drowning”. Musically, if you’ve not heard The Tain (the 2004 EP), it is nearly unlike anything you might imagine the band doing — “there’s a lot of exploration about where British folk met prog in the early 70s, late 60s”, says Meloy — except that it sounds like you’d hope it would sound, noodly organ and occasionally romping pace notwithstanding. Lyrically, it is exactly what you’d expect from the band. The mention of “Sycorax” in the song ties it, at least distantly, to Shakespeare’s The Tempest, while the mention of “Patagon” in the next line seems to tie it to a legendary tribe of South American giants reported by Magellan and his crew in the 1500s.

Thus so with the title track, which makes a beautiful, bittersweet, poignant three part song from a famous Japanese folk tale. Briefly, the story goes something like this:

a poor man finds an injured crane on his doorstep (or outside with an arrow in it), takes it in and nurses it back to health. After releasing the crane, a woman appears at his doorstep who he falls in love with and marries. Because they are in need of money, his wife offers to weave wondrous clothes out of silk that they could sell at the market, but only if he agrees never to watch her when she is making it. They begin to sell them and live a comfortable life, but he soon makes her weave them more and more. Oblivious to his wife’s diminishing health, his greed increases and he eventually peeks in to see what she is doing to make the silk she weaves so desirable. He is shocked to discover that at the loom is a crane plucking feathers from her body and weaving them into the loom. The crane, seeing him, flies away and never returns.

The Decemberists made the third part the first track on the album and put the first two parts together as the penultimate track. The third part deals with the loss of the crane wife and the shame of the man who in his oblivious greed abused and spied on her. It is not until we reach the ninth track that we hear how the story began, knowing already how their fate will be sealed. It’s a clever idea. It serves to make the instrumental arrangement all the more heart-tugging. When Meloy reaches the lines (in the second part) — singing them with such sadness — “But I was greedy, I was vain and I forced her to weaving / On a cold loom, in a closed room down the hall”, your heart feels torn in half.

It was also a good idea not to end the album on such a sad, sad note. The final track, “Sons and Daughters”, though lightly touched with a wistfullness defined by what isn’t said, is an uplifting, hopeful piece. If it is the ultimate statement of the album, then what it says is this: life is prone to tragedy, love is hard and doesn’t always overcome the folly, but we can always try, because we still might make it in the end. We need to remember the stories, and we need to keep trying. The Decemberists have given our effort a new soundtrack, and it is very, very good indeed.

Category: Music  | Comments off
Saturday, September 23rd, 2006 | Author: Moody

In order to protect email addresses from being harvested, I have added the Caesarmail plugin, which dynamically converts all email addresses using “random-offset Caesar ciphers”. This prevents spambots from collecting usable email addresses from pages/comments. Spammers aren’t likely to take the time to decipher encrypted email addresses.

Q: What’s a Caesar cipher?

A: A basic character-shift method for encoding/obfuscating text. [More]

Here is an example of the ROT13 method: Urer vf na rknzcyr bs gur EBG13 zrgubq.

ROT13 is a Caesar cipher where the characters of the alphabet are rotated 13 places (e –> r, a –> n). ROT13 is often used because the same step that encodes the selected text also decodes the text. The nice thing about the Caesarmail plugin is that the offset is “randomly generated with each page view”.

Though simple and ultimately easy to decode, the Caesar cipher method can be useful at frustrating the casual viewer. Try this if you’d like [decoded text after the cut]:

. CDYWR MNBANENA MWJ , WXRCJDCLWDY BDXDPRKVJ , HCRERCRBWNBWR NBJL , BUJANVDW XW , NWRW OX NDUJE CXA J QCRF ANQYRL AJBNJL J . ANQYRLNM XC CUDLROORM NAXV NUCCRU J PWRQCNVXB BR NANQ .

more…

Friday, September 22nd, 2006 | Author: Moody

First thing: Thanks to you who commented to my test [now deleted]. I wanted to make sure I had not inadvertently gotten blocked the handful of people who might conceivably comment here. If you were blocked from posting a comment and you don’t know my email address, please email me here (provided email address good for one week, courtesy of Spambox).

Now for the recommendations….

But first, a little story.

Once upon a time (it was not actually a dark and stormy night, but it could have been), I moved from my “apartment” at LiveJournal to this, my “home” here at BlueHost, where I had them set up a WordPress blog for me. Once I was up and running — in virtually no time at all, actually — I posted a few things. All was well and good in my personal corner (niche?) of the blogosphere. But I began to worry anyway… because that’s what I do, m’kay.

Specifically, I began to worry about “comment spam“, also called “link spam”. Although I had not received any, I knew it was only a matter of time. So, I installed Akismet.

You have better things to do with your life than deal with the underbelly of the internet. Automattic Kismet (Akismet for short) is a collaborative effort to make comment and trackback spam a non-issue and restore innocence to blogging, so you never have to worry about spam again.

WordPress made installing the Akismet filter easy as (memorizing the first four digits of) Ï€. And, in the course of time, it began to catch spam. At first there were just a few. Then, there were a few more, and a few more. And then, there were a lot more. At last count, Akismet has caught 1050 spam comments to this blog. Top hits: ringtones, viagra (and other assorted pharmaceuticals), gambling. Not that I wanted to know; but Akismet saves all the spam in a database for a period of days before automatically deleting them. I did not have a single false positive, and I trusted the filter. It started bothering me, though, that the spam comments were getting so close to me, infiltrating my precious allotted hard drive space, wasting my even more precious bandwidth. I didn’t want to see the spam anymore, jailed by Akismet or not. I wanted it stopped before it reached me at all.

Enter Bad Behavior:

[A] set of PHP scripts which prevents spambots from accessing your site by analyzing their actual HTTP requests and comparing them to profiles from known spambots. It goes far beyond User-Agent and Referer, however. Bad Behavior is available for several PHP-based software packages, and also can be integrated in seconds into any PHP script.

There are a lot of plugins for WordPress, a number of them dedicated to stopping spam. Out of the many I looked at, Bad Behavior struck me as being particularly effective. So, I installed it. Quickly and easily, too, using Fetch. Once I fired up the plugin, I didn’t have too long to wait. Within an hour Bad Behavior had caught ~20 “spambots” (see the Web Robots FAQ for more info) trying to accomplish their nefarious ends. Since yesterday, it has caught 77 spambots. And nothing has gotten through even to Akismet. Needless to say, I am quite pleased with Bad Behavior and hope someday to donate some currency to its creator, Michael Hampton (who also happens to run a recommended site, Homeland Stupidity).

Sunday, September 17th, 2006 | Author: Moody

There are many issues where I am, in the face of whatever it is that’s annoying me (like an angry pimple) or grating on me (like a stiff piece of broken plastic being dragged edge-on down a dirty chalkboard), a quite tolerant person. I can put up with a lot. Often enough I smile when I want to strangle, kindly defer when I want to shout down, reasonably articulate my objection in a mild manner when I want to crush and burn, etc. I do my best to see the other side of an issue, even when we’re talking things I’ve very strong opinions about (like abortion rights, GLBT rights, and human rights), even when it gives me a freakin’ headache. It’s the way we remain civilized in the best sense of the word.

Normally, I am utterly opposed to the “death penalty”. But there are times when I feel I need to make an exception. There are times when the annoyance is ratcheted up to psychic migraine status and I start hearing Cannibal Corpse’s “The Time to Kill is Now” (lyrics after the break) flailing about in my head like the Angel of Death, weapon set to ANNIHILATE. Images appear in my mind from my Fallout 2 days….

I know it’s wrong to kill… and yet…

The spammer should die. Spammers should die. Blot on the Internet, bane of decency, chokers of bandwidth and wasters of precious time, leeches and parasites wrapped in capitalistic (even nationalistic) masturbatory fantasies, worthless punters and prats, peddlers of the foulest garbage, greedy hucksters of deception; there’s no good spammer but a dead spammer.

80% of spam received by Internet users in North America and Europe can be traced via aliases and addresses, redirects, hosting locations of sites and domains, to a hard-core group of around 200 known spam operations (”spam gangs”), almost all of whom are listed in the ROKSO database. These spam operations consist of an estimated 500-600 professional spammers with ever-changing aliases and domains. The vast majority of those listed here operate illegally and move from network to network (and country to country) seeking out “spam-friendly” Internet Service Providers (”ISPs”) known for lax enforcing of anti-spam policies. [Source]

These criminals see nothing wrong with what they do to me or you. In fact, they don’t care about anyone but themselves — and what’s there to care for in them? Nothing! Nothing whatsoever! When I look at the spam I receive every day — via email or caught by my blog’s filter — I feel violently angry. I am not amused at all by their efforts. I don’t find any of it ingenious. I don’t think for an instant that they are using any sort of a viable business model. They are simply wastrels, deadbeats, assholes, no account shitheels. I don’t care what they have to say about themselves or their efforts. It is perfectly clear that their one real motivation is to make money as easily as possible, regardless of consequences. I can hear Daffy Duck saying, “Consequences, schmonsequences, as long as I’m rich”. (Or was that the BushCo chorus?) Point is, they’ve not one redeemable feature or characteristic to them. They serve no good purpose.

So, — they ought to die. Spammers should be rounded up and killed en masse. They should be used as extras in movies where people die violently, only it should be real when they die. Butcher them, I say, and then feed them to dieased dogs on a radioactive island somewhere. Use them as armor for vehicles in Iraq (doesn’t matter whose vehicles). Experiment on them with new medications or try out radical new medical procedures on them. Supply bloodthirsty, sociopathic, psychopathic mental patients with genuine, unwilling victims. Use them in place of cadavers to teach premed students about the body. Make car crash tests more fun.

But only after they’ve had everything taken from them. Whatever is of monetary value should be taken and auctioned off to help feed the hungry, clothe the poor, make shelters for the homeless. Whatever spammers have feelings for should be publicly stripped from their lives. And as they are reduced to nothing, before the blade falls or the bullet flies or the psychopath begins to chew and rip and rend, they should be publicly humiliated and ridiculed and shamed. As a culture, we should learn to focus all the badness in us — all the ill will, hatred, detestation, dislike, distaste, abhorrence, abomination, execration, aversion, hostility, ill feeling, enmity, animosity, antipathy, revulsion, disgust, contempt, and odium — on them. What an orgy of catharsis and purgation that would be!

We totally should do it. Just as soon as we’re done with molesters and rapists and those who lead us into war for no good reason.

.

Hey, I can fantasize, Twenty-first Century style, can’t I?

more…

Category: Personal  | Comments off
Saturday, September 16th, 2006 | Author: Moody

Google “my mother died” and you will get over 500,000 hits. Google “my mother is dying” and the number drops to a little over 15,000. I think I understand why that is. It’s the finality of the former that prompts people to talk. It’s the grief. It’s the need to say something about her death that makes a person speak. While she’s still alive there’s only the moment of her death approaching, like a sky darkening with an oncoming storm when the first drops have yet to fall and the air is beginning to smell vaguely of rain, — while she’s still alive, there’s only anticipation, and breath, and quiet anticipation.

Tonight, the day after her 83rd birthday, I spoke with my mom on the phone for awhile, hearing her labored breath and fatigue as well as her joy at talking with me. She was very up front with me: she’s not doing well; her health is sliding downhill faster, now. They have her on both methadone and morphine to ease the pain. (It won’t be long.) My mother’s bones are as fragile as a bird’s, her spine is curving from the exclamation point of the young to the interrogative mark of the elderly. Her organs, especially her heart, are being compressed and distressed. “Sometimes I find myself thinking, I just want this over with! I don’t want to wait any longer!” she said to me. Sometimes, though, she wants to stay long enough to hear the voices of all her children one more time. Just one more day with familial voices softly, implicitly entreating her to love each moment more.

Tonight, I thanked her. “I know that you always tried”, I said, and she did. She tried. She loves me now just as she did when I was born, and however she mismanaged things or misunderstood me, her heart’s love was, and is, genuine. I made her cry with my words. They were words she needed to hear at the end of her days. She said, “After I’m gone, I’m going to give all you children a hug every morning”. Genuine love. (It won’t be long.)

Some part of me feels, totally irrationally, that someday I’ll look back on this whole “my mom is dying” thing and think how glad I am that she didn’t, that she’ll live forever. But when I look into my own thoughts, I know that she’ll soon be gone, permanently gone, irretrievably gone. My mother will have died, will have entered the silence only broken by those left behind. She will exist as a dynamic collection of memories in my brain and in the brains of others. My memories of her will be unique and wholly my own, and nobody will ever be able to read them or comprehend them in their totality. When my mother dies, I will never feel her warm hands on my cheeks again, never again feel her breath brush the short hairs of my neck as she hugs me, never look into her pale eyes that saw me as me. But I will remember, and I will feel her hands and her breath in the emotions I’ve wrapped them in. In my memories I will always know that my mother did live, concretely, as a real person who gave birth to me, fixed food for me, tucked me into bed, nursed my wounds and smiled at my laughter, fought with me, made up with me, rallied for me, … and on and on, loved me.

My mother is dying. She will soon be gone. I, however, will carry her love on. She taught me to carry it forward, even when she failed me. Even when she failed me, I say, but I have forgiven her her shortcomings. She has been, like me, like all of us, just another person in the world, as prone to minor and major follies and foibles and tragic flaws as anyone else. Unlike anyone else, though, she gave me life and she loved me endlessly as her child. Even when the meaning amounted to different things, she wanted the best for me. Well, she was the best for me; from her I learned that love matters most, that kindness is better than its lack, that in the end there is no one whose story you know completely save your own — so who are you to lay judgment on anybody’s doorstep? She didn’t mean you had to love or even like everyone, let alone those who did terrible things. She meant that you ought to at least understand that people all have lives you can’t really know, and what they do is caused or created in them for reasons you’ll never fathom or even see.

I’ll do my best to remember what she tried to teach me, try to grow on what I learned from her. That’s how I’ll honor her now and after she’s gone. (It won’t be long.)

.

But oh… how this hurts.

Saturday, September 09th, 2006 | Author: Moody

This strange creature I am…. Every day another gambit, another stumble, another folly, another stroke of genius or spasm of the idiot savant in me. Yesterday: melancholy, death metal, and smiles for Jung. Today: vitriol, treacle, and a joke concerning a man and a bar. Tomorrow: …? I have no plans; my outlook is a façade of mother-of-pearl. And I notice again that my belly is a little more round, now. My hair is a bit thinner and has receded farther (I do not say “retreated”, as my hair is not afraid) up my skull. My eyes are just as blue, and for all the same reasons — reasons both scientific and superstitious — and express with delicacy my unspoken thoughts. Blue eyes as blue as the sea, as the sky, as Billie Holiday’s veins or Nina Simone’s light. My longing is intact in fleshed out paradigm, but it is suffering from pixelation — a numb penumbra of platitudinous plasticity. Every day, I hope to get by. Every day, my hope gets a little bit broader, a little more vague. Every day I feel a little more everyday, but my heart remembers Borges and worries its feathers as absently it contemplates. The night’s still solace remains terrific to me.

Hmm…

Let’s go, you and I should. There is a place in me I’ve been dying for you to know. It is where the river Sane plunges smoothly into a void. The opening to the void is shaped like the lips of a courtesan saying, “Ahhhh…” — run in reverse. It is the very moment, formed into the likeness of a place out of time, when I simultaneously fall fast adream and awake, eyes wide open. I am never sure on which side of the equation I am, on which side I exist. But I am sure Borges was right when he said,

A man sets out to draw the world. As the years go by, he peoples a space with images of provinces, kingdoms, mountains, bays, ships, islands, fishes, rooms, instruments, stars, horses, and individuals. A short time before he dies, he discovers that the patient labyrinth of lines traces the lineaments of his own face.

I have known this for a very long time, now. I discovered it shortly before I died my first time. Don’t ask me when that was; I was a different person, then, and the time was a different time. Some lessons transcend particular timelines to become eternal. Such lessons reside at nodes, at nexus, as nuance resides in the educated meaning of some sentence, beyond the frail claim of the dictionary proper.

I have known it, and, too, that it means nothing more or less than what I import to it or from it. Here and now I am thinking of fractal forms, of self-repeating replicators reproducing ceaselessly. In the end, they recreate the face of all faces. That is where you get closest to the anthropomorphic “God” of our species, and see yourself therein like some grand secret. That there is infinitely more beyond it is — inconvenient, for some, hateful, for others, a relief for a few and an inebriating fire of profoundest pleasure for fewer still. But once you have fallen into that courtesan’s mouth (like a candied cherry or a peeled grape) and been sucked into the void, there is nothing to deny… or, well, nothing is undeniable and everything is everything. In such a state of mind (“Æternum servans sub pectore vulnus” — Virgil) and weary from the labors of some given/unnamed day, I lay me down by my love’s softly, slowly, undulating side, to feel her stir somewhere in the warm depths of her own deep night. She presses back into me and sighs out her breath and I feel as if I understand in this moment why it is that I remain “I” against the familiar dread pull of all entropic reason.

The night’s still solace remains terrific to me, and I am terrified by my failure to be negated, but my mind glows in the redolent embers of love’s bare mythologies and strives to live on. As I light another Kool cigarette and take another swallow of malt liquor, arch my back and stretch my toes, the sheer inertia of my animal sense of Dasein overwhelms my wounded pride with a cosmic lust for encompassing existence wholly by being consciously encompassed by it. To completely and absolutely (not to say utterly) recognize the whole along with one’s part in the whole, one’s place and role in it, is to forget for a time the stinging barb of the ineluctable modality of one’s unassuageable existential vagabondage.

And so I go.

Category: Personal  | Comments off
Tuesday, August 15th, 2006 | Author: Moody

“God is dead.” — Nietzsche

“Nietzsche is dead.” — God Death

“Death is God.” — Some Goths and Death Metallers

“Death is dead.” — Cthullhu

And still, life goes on.

Category: Personal  | Comments off
Tuesday, August 15th, 2006 | Author: Moody

From Congress.org:

Weekly Update August 14, 2006: Your Ideas: Constitutional Amendment: Right to Privacy. As part of our focus on activists and their ideas, we present this proposed idea for legislation from Bonita Springs, Fl. A “Privacy Amendment” to state and the U.S. Constitutions that guarantees a right to privacy in all areas of our lives. This would impact things such as telemarketeing calls, medical records access, gun registration, abortion, gay rights and many other areas of personal behavior and activity. Most of these issues were impacted by courts’ interpretations of a right to privacy and the debate as to whether the U.S. Constitution has an implied right to privacy as was decided for example in Roe v. Wade. By passing an amendment, this issue and others would be decided once and for all. Should your elected officials support or introduce a constitutional amendment that guarantees a right to privacy? Write to President Bush, Congress and your governor and state legislature to let them know your views on this idea.

This is my response:

Honorable Sirs and Mesdames, the Right of Privacy is something that needs to be specifically addressed by the Government of the United States in our Constitution, such that present and future generations shall have a protected right with regard to their personal lives, information, and individual doings (where these may not be legitimately and reasonably construed as supporting the breaking of the already esablished and accepted laws of the country). There is no reason for not ensuring the Right of Privacy, and many reasons to do so.

The 9th, 3rd, 4th, and 5th amendments are not fully adequate to the task, and it seems plain that this is so by reason of the matter being unsettled in the courts (including the court of public opinion). An amendment to the Constitution would settle this by clearly stating what the inherent right of every citizen is in regard to privacy.

Hon. Sirs and Mesdames, the government exists as an extension of both the will of the people of the United States and the wisdom of the country’s founders. To an extent it is clear that the Constitution supercedes the fashions of the day; its core values are effectively immutable. But it is equally clear that its design enjoys the ability to adapt as society changes generationally, indeed it must do so. As Jefferson pointed out, every generation needs a new revolution. Privacy ought to be a protected right, lest some in power divine in the sea change an end to their power (which they were elected to and not given in perpetuity) and seek to throw down the tide. Every wave thrown back to the sea lends itself to the creation of an unconquerable tsunami or to the making of a dead sea. Neither end ought to be thought desireable.

However clear it is to some member of our esteemed government that his or her personal opinion on some important matter is pure and true for all, it is never in his or her purview to surpass the granted authority of the country’s laws or the wise discourse of its founders with regard to the liberty of the country’s citizens.

Privacy is an essential component of liberty, being a support beam in the right of autonomy and self-rule promoted by the founders of our country and sketched out in its Constitution. We are a nation of individuals who — in order to maintain life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness — require that our personal lives remain free from trespass. American citizens are not children in need of parenting. American citizents should enjoy the greatest privilege of self-rule and autonomy, free from the untried dictates of those in positions of power who would claim the right to make them.

I hope that you will consider the desire of our nation’s founders, as well as the content and spirit of this humble letter, in supporting an amendment that will make clear the right of privacy for all citizens as part of the nation’s Constitution.

Thank you.

This letter was sent to:

  • George W. Bush (R)
  • Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA)
  • Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)
  • Arnold Schwarzenegger (R-CA)
  • Representative Hilda L. Solis (D-CA 32nd)
  • Gloria Romero (D-CA 24th)
  • Carol Liu (D-CA 44th)
Category: Personal, Politics  | Comments off
Sunday, August 13th, 2006 | Author: Moody

[image]It seems a bit strange to me that, in this age of computers and their ubiquitous presence, especially in relation to the Web, my coworkers generally don’t surf the Web or use computers outside of work. They are, or so I have found, only dimly aware of what goes on online; their opinions about the Web — about a lot of things, really — seem to come mainly from the television news. None of them, so far as I know, have a blog or a MySpace page. It almost flies in the face of reason that, out of about a dozen coworkers, none of them seem to use the Internet beyond what one would call a minimal amount.

According to the Internet World Stats page for North America, Internet usage has a population penetration of 68.6 percent in this part of the world (Pew puts it, based on a more recent poll, at 73 percent in America). What’s the likelihood of so many of my coworkers being Web ignorant? And what does it mean that they are?

Two of my coworkers have asked me (at least one of them sincerely) if I thought that we, humanity, are living in the “End Times” described in the Bible and, I inferred, in the so-called prophecies of Nostrodamus. I have overheard a few discussions about this — on the surface ridiculous — topic. These are two people I know to be generally ignorant about current world events beyond what they see occasionally on whatever news network happens to be playing on the television in the break room at work. I also know that they do not understand how one would go about keeping up with current events and news online. Another coworker recently asked me, apropos of the weather, if Ohio is located near Texas. This coworker has no computer at home and does not really want one.

I bring this up because it seems to me that the less educated one is (and the less one cares about education), the less interest in or use of the Internet will be demonstrated. It would seem that the Pew Internet and American Life Project (using data gathered in 2002) found this to be true; the vast majority of Internet users in America, 83.7 percent, have a “post-graduate” level of education. Pew also found that

Over time, internet users have become more likely to note big improvements in their ability to shop and the way they pursue their hobbies and interests. A majority of internet users also consistently report that the internet helps them to do their job and improves the way the get information about health care.

A number of my coworkers have children or will likely have children, and I wonder how their children will fare. If these current and future parents have no interest in the Internet or information technology, and if their kids are not taught how to effectively utilize computers and information technology, what will become of them? Are these coworkers, themselves condemned to the wrong side of the digital divide, — are they condemning their kids to the same end?

Although it is clear that more children are now being educated in computer-equipped classrooms, it is just as clear that underfunded schools in low-income districts need help if their kids are to access the computers they need in modern America. It doesn’t take a Bill Gates to notice that American schools desperately need computers and higher technology in their classrooms if students are ever going to compete in the world marketplace. It does take, perhaps, Bill Gates to bring it to the attention of governors:

When [Melinda and I] looked at the millions of students that our high schools are not preparing for higher education – and we looked at the damaging impact that has on their lives – we came to a painful conclusion: America’s high schools are obsolete. By obsolete, I don’t just mean that our high schools are broken, flawed, and under-funded – though a case could be made for every one of those points. By obsolete, I mean that our high schools – even when they’re working exactly as designed – cannot teach our kids what they need to know today.

My daily life is inextricably tied to my access to the Web. What’s on my mind, what predominates and prevails in my consciousness, leads me to the Web like thirst leads a horse to water; I need the Web to slake my thirst for expansion, — the expansion of my knowlege, my understanding, my comprehension. I would go so far as to posit that this thirst, and this desire to quench or assuage this thirst, is necessary for any human being who would thrive as fully as she or he is capable. That we have the Web is not accidental, not dislodged from cause and effect. It is a manifestation of that thirst and desire, and it is an example — the marketplace aside — of our minds continuing to evolve and struggle to survive.

Therefore, it falls on us, each of us, to promote the Web and to do our best to ensure that it is available to all, regardless of any societal divisions. We can do that by obtaining/maintaining access to a computer for our kids and encouraging them to learn how to use the Web effectively, by fighting for the rights of all to have such access, and by supporting organizations like the Community Technology Centers’ Network. If you are reading this, then you have that responsibility to a greater or lesser degree, because you are positioned to do something to help. Even if all you do is advocate computer and Web use to your peers, friends and family, you are doing something good for society as a whole. The goal is, ultimately, to push people toward a necessary paradigm shift that considers the Web to be an everyday utility like electricity or the phone. In other words, the Web must become transparent in society, something really thought about only when it’s not working right.

Then again, it may be that what I’m really arguing for is the promotion of education and the love of education generally. And that I am, certainly. But it’s guaranteed access to and effective use of the Web that levels the playing field presently. Though the Web is not perfect, and though it has its pitfalls and dangers, it is still the most important tool in one’s toolbox, a Swiss Army knife for education, news, general information, mind expansion, entertainment, and many other things. It is a Swiss Army knife with a passkey to the world’s ongoing life told in first, second and third person (limited and omniscient). Used intelligently and effectively, there are very few limitations to what a person can learn or discover on the Web. Such a tool should not be denied to anyone.

Category: Meta: Web, Personal  | Comments off